The definitions in our glossary are primarily sourced from Nolo’s Plain-English Law Dictionary and Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute. We have made slight modifications where needed for brevity and to better tailor the definitions to the specific needs of users of this website. For more detailed explanations of the terms, users are encouraged to review the definitions on these websites or conduct their own independent research.
CASE NAME
Toney v. The Clorox Company
Overview
Plaintiff, a 63-year old white man, alleged that his employer's DEI policies that "focused on promoting the inclusion of non-white workers and female workers in the workforce" led to his termination.
Details
Plaintiff the district court's decision to grant Defendant's and dismiss the case on Plaintiff's claims of age, gender, and race discrimination against his former employer.
On April 25, 2025, the court of appeals reversed the lower court's decision on Plaintiff's gender discrimination claim and affirmed the age and race claims. For the gender discrimination claim, the court concluded that Defendant's reasons for terminating Plaintiff were inconsistent due to positive annual reviews, minimal concerns about Plaintiff's performance prior to termination, and a company strategy that could be seen as a goal to increase the number of women managers.
On May 9, 2025, Plaintiff filed a petition for partial panel rehearing in order to reconsider the age discrimination claim. On May 19, the court denied the request.
Court
Ninth Circuit
Status
Filed April 23, 2024 | Decided
Litigation History