The definitions in our glossary are primarily sourced from Nolo’s Plain-English Law Dictionary and Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute. We have made slight modifications where needed for brevity and to better tailor the definitions to the specific needs of users of this website. For more detailed explanations of the terms, users are encouraged to review the definitions on these websites or conduct their own independent research.
Explainer
School and University Admissions
Advancing DEI Initiative
The court decision that most directly gave rise to the recent wave of anti-DEI lawsuits is the Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard (SFFA) decision from June 2023, in which the U.S. Supreme Court effectively ended race-conscious admissions in universities that are public or receive federal funding.
So far, other challenges to school and university admissions policies have focused on:
Whether other categories of institutions not addressed in the SFFA decision, such as military academies, may continue to consider race in admissions; and
To what extent educational institutions may adopt race-neutral policies that have the intent or effect of increasing racial diversity.
It is too early to draw sweeping conclusions from the ongoing cases, especially in the context of employment rather than education. Even a decision that is a setback for DEI in education would not necessarily have the same effect in employment, as the laws governing DEI in the workplace are different from the laws governing DEI in education. However, we are still monitoring these cases closely, as they may give insight into how courts are reasoning about race in general. As we have seen with the SFFA decision itself, sometimes cases that are not directly related to DEI in the workplace can have downstream consequences for the law or for legal activism.