The definitions in our glossary are primarily sourced from Nolo’s Plain-English Law Dictionary and Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute. We have made slight modifications where needed for brevity and to better tailor the definitions to the specific needs of users of this website. For more detailed explanations of the terms, users are encouraged to review the definitions on these websites or conduct their own independent research.
CASE NAME
United States of America v. State of Minnesota
Overview
The Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a lawsuit against Minnesota challenging the state's affirmative action requirements for public employment.
Details
The DOJ alleges that Minnesota's affirmative action laws violate Title VII by requiring state agencies to classify employees and job candidates by race, color, sex, and national origin, and to track "underutilization" of protected groups. The complaint claims that when underutilization exists, the state imposes additional procedural burdens on candidates who are not members of designated protected groups, thereby discriminating against them in hiring, promotion, and other employment decisions. DOJ argues this constitutes an unlawful pattern or practice of limiting, segregating, and classifying employees based on protected characteristics.
Court
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota
Status
Filed January 14, 2026 | Ongoing
Relevant Law
Title VIISignificance
This case could have major implications for workplace diversity programs, as it appears designed to challenge the legal basis for affirmative action in employment at the Supreme Court level.