The definitions in our glossary are primarily sourced from Nolo’s Plain-English Law Dictionary and Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute. We have made slight modifications where needed for brevity and to better tailor the definitions to the specific needs of users of this website. For more detailed explanations of the terms, users are encouraged to review the definitions on these websites or conduct their own independent research.
CASE NAME
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. The New York Times Company
Overview
Plaintiff alleges that Defendant failed to promote the Charging Party, Bryant Rousseau, because he is white and male. Rousseau worked as an editor for the New York Times since 2014 and claimed he had no path for advancement despite qualifications. He claimed less qualified Black women were hired over him, which was consistent with Defendant's goal to increase the representation of Black women in leadership roles.
Details
On May 15, 2026, Bryant Rousseau filed a motion to intervene as a plaintiff and stated that he has a statutory right to intervene due to his charge of discrimination leading to this suit.
On June 3, 2026, the court granted Rousseau's motion to intervene.
On June 8, 2026, Rousseau filed an intervenor complaint against Defendant alleging that the New York Times has prioritized filling gaps in racial diversity amongst leadership and gaps in promotion among employees of color. Rousseau cites Defendant's Diversity and Inclusion Report and "A Call to Action: Building a Culture that Works for All of Us" to allege that Defendant publicly committed to referencing Black women when filling leadership roles. Plaintiff stated that Defendant set an explicit racial quota to "increase the representation of Black and Latino colleagues in leadership by 50 percent over the next five years".
Court
U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
Status
Filed May 05, 2026 | Ongoing