CASE NAME

Students for Fair Admissions v. U.S. Military Academy at West Point

Overview

Plaintiff challenges the race-conscious admissions program at West Point military academy, arguing that the program is unconstitutional following the Supreme Court's decision in Students for Fair Admissions v Harvard (2023).

Details

Defendants argue that the U.S. military has a compelling national security interest in a diverse officer corps, including that diversity is critical to army cohesion and lethality, recruitment, retention, and the military’s legitimacy in the nation and the world.

The court denied Plaintiff’s request for a preliminary injunction on January 3, 2024, stating that additional facts were needed to determine whether the admissions process was unconstitutional.

Plaintiff appealed this decision to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals on January 4 and the Supreme Court on January 26. Both courts ultimately dismissed the appeal, and the case remains pending for further litigation.

On April 11, 2025, Defendants informed the court that they took all actions to comply with Executive Orders and agency policy, including removing race and ethnicity as factors in the admissions process. As a result of the change in admissions policy, Defendant asked the court to stay the case for sixty days so that both parties could discuss how this would impact the litigation.

On April 14, 2025, the court stayed the case.