The definitions in our glossary are primarily sourced from Nolo’s Plain-English Law Dictionary and Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute. We have made slight modifications where needed for brevity and to better tailor the definitions to the specific needs of users of this website. For more detailed explanations of the terms, users are encouraged to review the definitions on these websites or conduct their own independent research.
CASE NAME
Students for Fair Admissions v. U.S. Military Academy at West Point
Overview
Plaintiff challenges the race-conscious admissions program at West Point military academy, arguing that the program is unconstitutional following the Supreme Court's decision in Students for Fair Admissions v Harvard (2023).
Details
Defendants argue that the U.S. military has a compelling national security interest in a diverse officer corps, including that diversity is critical to army cohesion and lethality, recruitment, retention, and the military’s legitimacy in the nation and the world.
The court denied Plaintiff’s request for a preliminary injunction on January 3, 2024, stating that additional facts were needed to determine whether the admissions process was unconstitutional.
Plaintiff appealed this decision to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals on January 4 and the Supreme Court on January 26. Both courts ultimately dismissed the appeal, and the case remains pending for further litigation.
On April 11, 2025, Defendants informed the court that they took all actions to comply with Executive Orders and agency policy, including removing race and ethnicity as factors in the admissions process. As a result of the change in admissions policy, Defendant asked the court to stay the case for sixty days so that both parties could discuss how this would impact the litigation.
On April 14, 2025, the court stayed the case.
Court
U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
Status
Filed September 19, 2023 | Ongoing
Relevant Law
Equal Protection Clause