The definitions in our glossary are primarily sourced from Nolo’s Plain-English Law Dictionary and Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute. We have made slight modifications where needed for brevity and to better tailor the definitions to the specific needs of users of this website. For more detailed explanations of the terms, users are encouraged to review the definitions on these websites or conduct their own independent research.
CASE NAME
State of Missouri ex rel. Andrew Bailey v. Starbucks Corporation
Overview
Plaintiff, the State of Missouri, alleges that Defendant, Starbucks, engages in race and sex discrimination through its DEI programs, which "skew[s] the hiring pool towards people who are less qualified to perform their work, increasing costs for Missouri's consumers."
Details
On February 5, 2026, the court granted Defendant's motion to dismiss. The court stated that Plaintiff's complaint was filled with conclusory and speculative allegations that fail to establish actual, concrete, and particularized injuries to Missouri citizens.
On February 12, 2026, Plaintiff appealed the decision to grant Defendant's motion to dismiss to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals.
Court
Eighth Circuit
Status
Filed February 13, 2026 | Ongoing
Litigation History