The definitions in our glossary are primarily sourced from Nolo’s Plain-English Law Dictionary and Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute. We have made slight modifications where needed for brevity and to better tailor the definitions to the specific needs of users of this website. For more detailed explanations of the terms, users are encouraged to review the definitions on these websites or conduct their own independent research.
CASE NAME
Samuels v. New York City
Overview
Plaintiff, a Black man, is alleging illegal discrimination in the eligibility criteria of the NYC Women's Film Fund, which provides grants to women through public funds.
Details
Plaintiff argues that the NYC Women's Film Fund unlawfully excludes men from its grants and support for artists.
Defendant filed a , asserting that Plaintiff lacks standing to sue. Defendant argues that Plaintiff has never applied for the grant and is ineligible because he resides in Portugal. In response, Plaintiff submitted a letter to the court stating that he has not applied for the fund because of the ongoing sex discrimination.
On January 3, 2025 the court dismissed Plaintiff’s because he wasn’t able to establish by either 1) alleging that he applied to and was rejected by the program or 2) alleging that he was “able and ready to apply” but that doing so would be futile. Regarding the second means of establishing standing, the court found that Plaintiff had not provided facts to show that he was eligible for the specific program challenged. The court also concluded that he had not shown how applying for the program would be futile due to “consistent discriminatory treatment of actual applicants..”
Court
U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
Status
Filed November 12, 2023 | Decided