The definitions in our glossary are primarily sourced from Nolo’s Plain-English Law Dictionary and Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute. We have made slight modifications where needed for brevity and to better tailor the definitions to the specific needs of users of this website. For more detailed explanations of the terms, users are encouraged to review the definitions on these websites or conduct their own independent research.
CASE NAME
Samuels v. Cornell Tech et al
Overview
Plaintiff, a Black man, is alleging unlawful discrimination in the eligibility criteria of Break Through Tech, a program offering computing and AI training as a pathway to careers in technology for "Black, Latina, Indigenous, and first-generation [cis]women, trans, and non-binary students."
Details
Plaintiff argues that he was unlawfully precluded from applying to the Break Through Tech program, and alleges that the program discriminates on the basis of gender identity and race.
The second Defendant (CUNY) argues that the complaint should be dismissed, as Plaintiff lacks standing to sue. According to Defendant, Plaintiff is not a student at a participating college, did not allege he was discriminated against based on his race, did not identify any actions of CUNY that caused him harm, and is not an employee of CUNY.
On March 10, 2025, the court granted Defendant's motion to dismiss because Plaintiff lacked standing since he did not allege that he was "able and ready" to apply to Defendant's programs.
Court
U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
Status
Filed March 14, 2024 | Decided
Topic
Targeted programs