CASE NAME

Roberts et al v. Progressive Preferred Insurance Company et al

Overview

Plaintiffs brought a class action challenge to Defendant’s program that offers grants of $25k to Black-owned small businesses to put toward purchase of a commercial vehicle.

Details

The district court dismissed the lawsuit for lack of standing, and Plaintiffs have appealed that decision. Plaintiffs contend that they have the right to sue for the past harm of being unable to apply to the program due to its race-based criteria.

Defendants argue that the district court correctly dismissed the case, emphasizing that Plaintiffs filed the lawsuit more than two months after the application window had closed and failed to provide evidence that a similar race-conscious grant would be offered in the future, undermining any claim of future harm. Regarding the alleged past harm of being unable to apply during the last application window on equal footing, Defendants assert that Plaintiffs lack standing because they did not demonstrate they would have been eligible to compete for the grant absent the racial criteria.

Court

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Status

Filed May 29, 2024 | Ongoing

Relevant Law

Section 1981
American Alliance for Equal Rights v. Fearless Fund Management, LLC (Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals)

Significance

This case illustrates that arguments based on standing can be a powerful tool in defending some anti-DEI lawsuits.