The definitions in our glossary are primarily sourced from Nolo’s Plain-English Law Dictionary and Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute. We have made slight modifications where needed for brevity and to better tailor the definitions to the specific needs of users of this website. For more detailed explanations of the terms, users are encouraged to review the definitions on these websites or conduct their own independent research.
CASE NAME
Meland v. Weber
Overview
Appellant challenges California law (SB 826) requiring publicly held corporations headquartered in California to have a minimum number of women on their boards of directors, arguing that it violates the Equal Protection Clause.
On June 6, 2022, the court suspended and closed the docket of the case until any of the decision in Crest et al. v. Padilla becomes final.
Details
Appellant appeals from the district court’s denial of a .
Court
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
Status
Filed February 01, 2022 | Decided
The court has stayed the appeal until any appeal of the decision in Crest et al v. Padilla (a similar case in state court challenging SB 826) becomes final.
Relevant Law
Equal Protection ClauseTopic
Government programsLitigation History