The definitions in our glossary are primarily sourced from Nolo’s Plain-English Law Dictionary and Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute. We have made slight modifications where needed for brevity and to better tailor the definitions to the specific needs of users of this website. For more detailed explanations of the terms, users are encouraged to review the definitions on these websites or conduct their own independent research.
CASE NAME
Kloosterman v. Metropolitan Hospital, et al
Overview
Plaintiff alleges that Defendants compelled her to violate her religious beliefs and independent medical judgment after a DEI training. Plaintiff asserts that Defendants attempted to get her to pledge to use patients' preferred pronouns and make referrals for gender transition drugs and procedures. After requesting a religious accommodation for the pledge, Plaintiff alleges that Defendants denigrated her religious beliefs and soon terminated her because of her beliefs. After the district court granted Defendants' to compel arbitration, Plaintiff appealed.
Details
On August 27, 2025, the court of appeals reversed and remanded the lower court's decision. It ruled that Defendants' request to arbitrate came too late since they waited for a year and got a preview of how the merits would play out in court. Additionally, Defendants sought to avoid arbitration by asking the lower court to dismiss the case repeatedly. Due to this behavior, the Court of Appeals ruled that Defendants lost their right to arbitrate.
Court
Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals
Status
Filed May 06, 2024 | Decided
Relevant Law
Equal Protection ClauseFirst AmendmentTitle VIIState lawMichigan Constitution
Elliot-Larson Civil Rights Act of 1976
Litigation History