CASE NAME

Kloosterman v. Metropolitan Hospital, et al

Overview

Plaintiff alleges that Defendants compelled her to violate her religious beliefs and independent medical judgment after a DEI training. Plaintiff asserts that Defendants attempted to get her to pledge to use patients' preferred pronouns and make referrals for gender transition drugs and procedures. After requesting a religious accommodation for the pledge, Plaintiff alleges that Defendants denigrated her religious beliefs and soon terminated her because of her beliefs. After the district court granted Defendants' to compel arbitration, Plaintiff appealed.

Details

On August 27, 2025, the court of appeals reversed and remanded the lower court's decision. It ruled that Defendants' request to arbitrate came too late since they waited for a year and got a preview of how the merits would play out in court. Additionally, Defendants sought to avoid arbitration by asking the lower court to dismiss the case repeatedly. Due to this behavior, the Court of Appeals ruled that Defendants lost their right to arbitrate.

Court

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Status

Filed May 06, 2024 | Decided

Relevant Law

Equal Protection ClauseFirst AmendmentTitle VIIState law

Michigan Constitution

Elliot-Larson Civil Rights Act of 1976