CASE NAME

Glennon v. Johnson et al

Overview

Plaintiff, a white man, claims that Defendants' efforts to meet a city agreement encouraging 25% ownership by people of color and 5% by women in its casino IPO discriminate against him based on race and sex by limiting his ability to buy shares.

Details

Plaintiff requested a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction to stop Defendants from distributing shares while the case continue in court. The court denied the requests because Plaintiff failed to establish a likelihood of success on the merits of the case and failed to show that he would suffer irreparable harm without an injunction.

On April 4, 2025, Defendants—the City of Chicago, the Illinois Gaming Board, and Bally’s Casino— each filed separate motions to dismiss, arguing that Plaintiff lacks standing to sue and has failed to bring valid claims against them.

On April 30, 2025, both parties agreed to dismiss the case.

Court

U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois

Status

Filed January 30, 2025 | Settled

Details of the settlement were not provided.