The definitions in our glossary are primarily sourced from Nolo’s Plain-English Law Dictionary and Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute. We have made slight modifications where needed for brevity and to better tailor the definitions to the specific needs of users of this website. For more detailed explanations of the terms, users are encouraged to review the definitions on these websites or conduct their own independent research.
CASE NAME
Glennon v. Johnson et al
Overview
Plaintiff, a white man, claims that Defendants' efforts to meet a city agreement encouraging 25% ownership by people of color and 5% by women in its casino IPO discriminate against him based on race and sex by limiting his ability to buy shares.
Details
Plaintiff requested a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction to stop Defendants from distributing shares while the case continue in court. The court denied the requests because Plaintiff failed to establish a likelihood of success on the merits of the case and failed to show that he would suffer irreparable harm without an injunction.
On April 4, 2025, Defendants—the City of Chicago, the Illinois Gaming Board, and Bally’s Casino— each filed separate motions to dismiss, arguing that Plaintiff lacks standing to sue and has failed to bring valid claims against them.
On April 30, 2025, both parties agreed to dismiss the case.
Court
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois
Status
Filed January 30, 2025 | Settled
Details of the settlement were not provided.