The definitions in our glossary are primarily sourced from Nolo’s Plain-English Law Dictionary and Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute. We have made slight modifications where needed for brevity and to better tailor the definitions to the specific needs of users of this website. For more detailed explanations of the terms, users are encouraged to review the definitions on these websites or conduct their own independent research.
CASE NAME
Fuzi v. Worthington Steel Company
Overview
Plaintiff, Fuzi, claims that his former employer, Worthington Steel Company, enforced a gender pronoun policy that conflicted with his religious beliefs. He alleges that the company’s refusal to provide reasonable accommodations, along with his subsequent termination, amounted to religious discrimination and retaliation.
Details
The company's policy requires staff to use individuals' identified pronouns, while Fuzi claims that his religion requires him to use pronouns that align with a person’s sex assigned at birth.
Court
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio
Status
Filed October 24, 2024 | Ongoing
Relevant Law
Title VII