The definitions in our glossary are primarily sourced from Nolo’s Plain-English Law Dictionary and Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute. We have made slight modifications where needed for brevity and to better tailor the definitions to the specific needs of users of this website. For more detailed explanations of the terms, users are encouraged to review the definitions on these websites or conduct their own independent research.
CASE NAME
Foundation Against Intolerance & Racism, Inc. v. Pickens et al
Overview
Plaintiff is challenging the West Virginia State Bar's bylaws, which reserve one seat on the Board of Governors for an African American member, alleging that the policy violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Details
The West Virginia State Bar is an agency of the state supreme court, responsible for regulating and overseeing the practice of law throughout the state. Its governing body, the Board of Governors, consists of 26 members who manage the agency.
Defendants are asking the court to dismiss the case, arguing that Plaintiff lacks standing. They contend that Plaintiff has not provided any facts showing that its members expressed a genuine interest in applying for the reserved board seat or took any steps to apply for a seat. Therefore, Defendants maintain that Plaintiff's members have not suffered any actual harm from the race-conscious selection criteria. Additionally, Defendants argue that they are not the appropriate parties to change the bylaws. They assert that the challenged bylaws were established by the state supreme court, not the Board of Governors, and therefore, the case against them should be dismissed.
Court
U.S. District Court, Northern District of West Virginia
Status
Filed December 19, 2024 | Ongoing
Relevant Law
Equal Protection ClauseTopic
Government programs