The definitions in our glossary are primarily sourced from Nolo’s Plain-English Law Dictionary and Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute. We have made slight modifications where needed for brevity and to better tailor the definitions to the specific needs of users of this website. For more detailed explanations of the terms, users are encouraged to review the definitions on these websites or conduct their own independent research.
CASE NAME
Duvall v. Novant Health, Inc.
Overview
Plaintiff, a white man, brought a discrimination claim against his former employer, claiming that he was fired to advance the employer's diversity goals.
Details
At trial, Plaintiff provided evidence that Defendant’s diversity and inclusion plan included financial incentives in the form of executive bonuses if certain representation targets for specific racial groups were achieved within a set time period. Additionally, Plaintiff showed that in spite of a consistent record of high performance, his termination was given without notice or a clear reason. Lastly, Plaintiff provided evidence that shortly after his termination he was replaced by three women (two were also racial minorities).
A jury returned a verdict finding that Plaintiff had proven that his race and/or sex were motivating factors in Defendant's decision to terminate his employment. The court held there was sufficient evidence for a reasonable jury to reach this verdict. However, it reduced the jury award of punitive damages from $10 million to $300,000.
Defendant appealed the jury verdict.
Court
U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina
Status
Filed November 18, 2019 | Appealed
Relevant Law
Title VIILitigation History