The definitions in our glossary are primarily sourced from Nolo’s Plain-English Law Dictionary and Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute. We have made slight modifications where needed for brevity and to better tailor the definitions to the specific needs of users of this website. For more detailed explanations of the terms, users are encouraged to review the definitions on these websites or conduct their own independent research.
CASE NAME
Do No Harm v. Lee II
Overview
Plaintiff challenges Tennessee laws requiring that at least one member of the state Chiropractic and Medical Boards be a racial minority.
Details
On December 5, 2024, Plaintiff moved for a preliminary injunction, asking the court to stop Defendant from enforcing the law while the case is being litigated.
On December 19, 2024, both sides asked the court to pause the case while a "statutory process" continues, which could change the law or require the legislature to appoint outside representation to defend the law in court. This is because the attorney general, who represents Defendant (Governor), has told the legislature that they believe the law is unconstitutional. The court granted the request.
Court
U.S. District Court, Middle District of Tennessee
Status
Filed November 07, 2024 | Ongoing
Relevant Law
Equal Protection ClauseTopic
Government programsSignificance
This case is an example of the far-reaching impact of the Supreme Court's Students For Fair Admissions v. Harvard (2023) decision, as plaintiffs are challenging many race-conscious requirements in the public sector.