The definitions in our glossary are primarily sourced from Nolo’s Plain-English Law Dictionary and Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute. We have made slight modifications where needed for brevity and to better tailor the definitions to the specific needs of users of this website. For more detailed explanations of the terms, users are encouraged to review the definitions on these websites or conduct their own independent research.
CASE NAME
Dill v. International Business Machines Corporation
Overview
Plaintiff, a white man, sued his former employer, IBM, for alleged discrimination based on race and sex.
Details
Plaintiff (Dill) claims that Defendant (IBM)'s leadership was "under pressure from the CEO and financially incentivized to hire people based on their skin color and sex." He claims his employment was terminated so that the company "could pursue its illegal racial quotas."
On October 23, 2024, IBM filed a , arguing that Dill failed to provide evidence that IBM had unlawful quotas or that its DEI initiative was related to his termination. IBM further asserted that Dill did not demonstrate in his that his firing was for any reason other than poor performance.
On March 26, 2025, the court denied Defendant's motion to dismiss because Plaintiff alleged enough facts, at this stage in the case, to support his claims.
On May 29, 2025, both parties filed a report that they had voluntarily mediated the issues and reached a settlement.
On July 7, 2025, the parties settled and the case was dismissed.
Court
U.S. District Court, Western District of Michigan
Status
Filed August 20, 2024 | Settled
Details about the settlement were not publicly disclosed.