The definitions in our glossary are primarily sourced from Nolo’s Plain-English Law Dictionary and Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute. We have made slight modifications where needed for brevity and to better tailor the definitions to the specific needs of users of this website. For more detailed explanations of the terms, users are encouraged to review the definitions on these websites or conduct their own independent research.
CASE NAME
Diemert v. City of Seattle
Overview
The district court ruled in favor of the City of Seattle, holding that DEI programs aimed at addressing racial inequalities are not necessarily discriminatory against white people, and that Plaintiff lacked factual support to make a hostile work environment claim. Plaintiff appealed the decision on February 25, 2025.
Details
On September 28, 2026, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision in part and reversed in part. The court of appeals reversed the district court's grant of summary judgment to Defendant as to Plaintiff's hostile work environment claims. The court of appeals concluded that Plaintiff established a genuine issue of material fact as to whether he was subjected to a racially hostile work environment. As to all other claims, the court of appeals affirmed the district court's decision.
Litigation History