The definitions in our glossary are primarily sourced from Nolo’s Plain-English Law Dictionary and Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute. We have made slight modifications where needed for brevity and to better tailor the definitions to the specific needs of users of this website. For more detailed explanations of the terms, users are encouraged to review the definitions on these websites or conduct their own independent research.
CASE NAME
DiBenedetto v. AT&T Services, Inc.
Overview
Older white male Plaintiff brought a discrimination claim, arguing he was fired due to his age, gender, and race, citing in part AT&T’s company-wide DEI program.
Details
Defendant sought summary judgment on the section 1981 claim and Title VII race and gender claims, arguing that Plaintiff has no direct or circumstantial evidence of race or sex discrimination, and that Plantiff’s selection for surplus was to “reduce costs, increase efficiencies, and retain the strongest and most qualified Assistant Vice President.”
Court
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Georgia
Status
Filed November 02, 2021 | Settled