The definitions in our glossary are primarily sourced from Nolo’s Plain-English Law Dictionary and Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute. We have made slight modifications where needed for brevity and to better tailor the definitions to the specific needs of users of this website. For more detailed explanations of the terms, users are encouraged to review the definitions on these websites or conduct their own independent research.
CASE NAME
Craig v. Target Corporation et al
Overview
Plaintiff brought a shareholder suit arguing that Target issued false and misleading proxy statements regarding the company’s adoption and oversight of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) mandates. The claim attacks Target’s LGBTQ+ Pride marketing and sales campaign.
Details
Target filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that Craig failed to identify specific statements that were materially false or misleading, and that Craig is in essence complaining about the company’s business judgment. On December 4, 2024, the court denied Target's request to dismiss the case. The court found that Craig presented enough facts to allow the case to proceed. Specifically, it determined that if Craig's claims were true, they could show that Target made misleading statements and failed to disclose potential social and reputational risks tied to its LGBTQ+ campaign, which contributed to a drop in stock price.
On January 5, 2025 both parties filed, and were ultimately granted, a motion to stay the case in order to participate in mediation. Plaintiff has since asked the court to lift the stay so that they can move forward with the case and explore a class-action lawsuit.
Court
U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida
Status
Filed August 08, 2023 | Ongoing
Relevant Law
Securities Exchange ActTopic
Directors' duties