The definitions in our glossary are primarily sourced from Nolo’s Plain-English Law Dictionary and Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute. We have made slight modifications where needed for brevity and to better tailor the definitions to the specific needs of users of this website. For more detailed explanations of the terms, users are encouraged to review the definitions on these websites or conduct their own independent research.
CASE NAME
City of Seattle v. Trump, et al.
Overview
The City of Seattle filed a lawsuit against President Trump that seeks to declare as unlawful and prevent the enforcement of the following executive orders: i) "Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity" (the "Anti-Diversity Order") and ii) "Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government" (the "Gender Order"). The City of Seattle asserts that these orders are unlawful because they are arbitrary and capricious, contrary to constitutional rights, and exceed the President's authority.
Details
On October 31, 2025, the court granted Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction. The court found that the Plaintiff is likely to succeed on the merits of their procedural claim, Defendants' actions are arbitrary and capricious, Plaintiff would sufferable irreparable injury, and the balance of the equities and public interest favor the Plaintiff.
On December 29, 2025, Defendants filed a notice of appeal to the Ninth Circuit on the district court's order granting the preliminary injunction.
Court
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
Status
Filed December 29, 2025 | Ongoing
Relevant Law
OtherSeparation of Powers
The Spending Clause
The Fifth and Tenth Amendments of the United States Constitution
The Administrative Procedure Act
Topic
Government programsLitigation History