The definitions in our glossary are primarily sourced from Nolo’s Plain-English Law Dictionary and Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute. We have made slight modifications where needed for brevity and to better tailor the definitions to the specific needs of users of this website. For more detailed explanations of the terms, users are encouraged to review the definitions on these websites or conduct their own independent research.
CASE NAME
Chislett v. New York City Department of Education et al
Overview
Plaintiff, a white woman, alleges race discrimination by her former employer, the New York City Department of Education.
Details
Plaintiff alleges that Defendant adopted a "race-based policy" making race a determinative factor in employment decisions, and required employers like her to attend implicit bias trainings and meetings, which together constituted race discrimination in violation of section 1983.
The district court dismissed Plaintiff's claim, finding that Defendant had legitimate and non-discriminatory reasons for adverse actions taken toward her. It further held that there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that the Department had a policy to make race a determinative factor in employment decisions. The court also found that there was no evidence from which a jury could find that Defendant's implicit bias training created a hostile work environment.
Court
U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
Status
Filed November 22, 2021 | Appealed
Relevant Law
Section 1983Litigation History