The definitions in our glossary are primarily sourced from Nolo’s Plain-English Law Dictionary and Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute. We have made slight modifications where needed for brevity and to better tailor the definitions to the specific needs of users of this website. For more detailed explanations of the terms, users are encouraged to review the definitions on these websites or conduct their own independent research.
CASE NAME
Californians for Equal Rights Foundation v. City of San Diego
Overview
Challenge to San Diego’s “BIPOC First-Time Homebuyer Program” which provides grants and loans to first-time homebuyers but allegedly restricts eligibility to people Black, Indigenous, or other people of color.
Details
On July 9, 2024, the court approved the request from both sides to remove the City of San Diego and its Housing Authority as defendants. The decision was based on the fact that the program was neither funded nor run by the city. This left only the San Diego Housing Commission, which operated independently, as the remaining Defendant.
Court
U.S. District Court, Southern District of California
Status
Filed March 12, 2024 | Settled
In February 2025, the parties reached a settlement after the San Diego Housing Commission agreed to remove race-based eligibility restrictions from the program.
Relevant Law
Equal Protection ClauseSignificance
This case is an example of the far-reaching impact of the Supreme Court's Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard (2023) decision, as plaintiffs challenge many race-conscious requirements in the public sector.