The definitions in our glossary are primarily sourced from Nolo’s Plain-English Law Dictionary and Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute. We have made slight modifications where needed for brevity and to better tailor the definitions to the specific needs of users of this website. For more detailed explanations of the terms, users are encouraged to review the definitions on these websites or conduct their own independent research.
CASE NAME
Bowen v. City and County of Denver
Overview
A man has brought a gender discrimination claim alleging that his police department failed to promote him to Captain because of his gender.
Details
Plaintiff points to the department’s goal of increasing gender representation as evidence he was passed over due to his gender. Defendant denies that it discriminated against Plaintiff, says that Plaintiff was not qualified to perform the duties of the Captain position, and says all actions it took with respect to Plaintiff were lawful, justified, and done in good faith.
On November 15, 2024, Defendant asked the court to rule in their favor based on the existing court record. Defendant argued that even if the allegations in the were true, Plaintiff failed to prove a claim of gender discrimination. In response, Plaintiff asserted that he had presented enough evidence to demonstrate discrimination, claiming he was more qualified than the selected candidates and that the promotion process was altered to disadvantage men.
On April 14, 2025, the court denied Defendant's for judgment based on the pleadings because it found that Plaintiff's allegations of discrimination were sufficient.
Court
U.S. District Court, District of Colorado
Status
Filed April 05, 2024 | Ongoing
Relevant Law
Title VIISignificance
This case may help clarify the extent to which diversity goals can be used as evidence in support of a discrimination claim by a member of a dominant group.