CASE NAME

Boston Parent Coalition for Academic Excellence Corp. v. The School Committee of the City of Boston et al

Download Opinionarrow_circle_right

Overview

Plaintiff challenged Defendant’s race-neutral admissions policy at high schools Boston Latin School, the Boston Latin Academy, and the John D. O’Bryant School of Mathematics and Science (collectively referred to as "Boston Exam Schools"), arguing that it discriminated against white and Asian applicants.

Details

A new admissions policy was adopted for Boston Exam Schools for the 2021-2022 school year, allocating a portion of seats to each Boston zip code based on the percentage of school-aged children living there. Students within each zip code then competed for those seats based on their pre-pandemic GPA.

On December 19, 2023, the Court of Appeals upheld the district court’s decision, ruling that Plaintiff did not prove the policy unfairly harmed white and Asian students. Although the plan slightly reduced their admissions numbers, white and Asian students were still significantly overrepresented compared to their share of the eligible school-age population.

The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear Plaintiff's appeal of the Court of Appeals decision. Justice Alito, joined by Justice Thomas, dissented, arguing that the Court of Appeals applied the wrong test for determining disparate impact. They stated that Plaintiff only needed to show the plan "reduced one racial group's chance of admission and increased another racial group's chance." They also argued that while disparate impact can show evidence of discriminatory intent, it is not a required element.

Court

U.S. Supreme Court

Status

Filed April 17, 2024 | Decided

Relevant Law

Equal Protection ClauseState law

Massachusetts General Law Chapter 76, Section 5