Ames v. State of Ohio Department of Youth Services | Advancing DEI Initiative

Home About Cases Methodology Resources In the Media

GLOSSARY

The definitions in our glossary are primarily sourced from Nolo’s Plain-English Law Dictionary and Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute. We have made slight modifications where needed for brevity and to better tailor the definitions to the specific needs of users of this website. For more detailed explanations of the terms, users are encouraged to review the definitions on these websites or conduct their own independent research.

A written request made after a trial court’s final ruling, asking another court to review the trial court's decisions. Appellate courts typically decide whether a legal mistake was made and whether the mistake changed the outcome of the case.

An out-of-court procedure for resolving disputes in which one or more people, “arbitrator(s),” hear evidence and make a decision. It's like a trial in some ways, but typically proceeds more quickly and with less formality.

A lawsuit in which a large number of people with similar legal claims join together (the class) to sue. In this context, it likely refers to cases in which a group of people claim they have suffered discrimination at the hands of an organization.

A document filed in court that starts a lawsuit. In some states and in some types of legal actions, the complaint is called a petition.

the money awarded to one party because of an injury or loss caused by another party.

The person or entity against whom a civil case is filed.

A court order requiring a person to do or stop doing a specific action.

Harm done to a person or organization by the acts or omissions of another. Injury may be physical or may involve damage to reputation, loss of a legal right, or breach of a contract.

An appeal that occurs before the trial court's final ruling on an entire case.

Any party to a lawsuit. This might include a plaintiff, defendant, petitioner, respondent, cross-complainant, or cross-defendant, but not a witness or attorney.

The process of bringing and pursuing (litigating) a lawsuit.

A formal request, either written or oral, that a judge enter a particular order or ruling in a lawsuit.

A motion asking the judge to throw out one or more claims or an entire lawsuit.

These phrases refer to a case whose decision rests upon the law as it applied to the particular evidence and facts presented. This is in opposition to cases whose decisions rest upon procedural grounds (e.g. not filing a timely complaint).

The person, corporation, or other legal entity that initiates a lawsuit seeking damages, enforcement of a contract, or a court determination of rights. In certain states and for some types of lawsuits, the term petitioner is used instead.

Any legal document filed in a lawsuit, including the complaint, answer, and motion(s). The pleading stage gives notice to both parties of the intention of the opposing party regarding the lawsuit.

An opinion of a federal or state court of appeals establishing a legal principle or rule that must be followed by lower courts when faced with similar legal issues.

A court order early in a lawsuit that prohibits the parties from taking a disputed action until the court can decide the merits of the case.

A document that public companies must provide their shareholders prior to a shareholder meeting. The document summarizes proposals submitted to shareholders for a vote.

Punishment of an employee by an employer for engaging in legally protected activity like making a complaint of harassment or participating in workplace investigations. It can include any negative job action, such as demotion, discipline, or firing.

A person's right to sue and have a court rule on their claims. To invoke a federal court's jurisdiction and have the court exercise its remedial powers on their behalf, a person must have standing.

A final decision by a judge, upon a party's motion, that resolves a lawsuit before there is a trial.

CASE NAME

Ames v. State of Ohio Department of Youth Services

Overview

Plaintiff (Ames), a former employee of the Ohio Department of Youth Services, sued Defendant arguing that she was discriminated against based on her sexual orientation (heterosexual) when Defendant denied her a promotion to Bureau Chief and demoted her from the position of PREA Administrator.

Details

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals rejected Ames's claim. The court found that Ames lacked evidence of “background circumstances to support the suspicion that the defendant is that unusual employer who discriminates against the majority.”

Ames appealed to the Supreme Court, requesting that the Court answer the question whether a majority-group plaintiff must show “background circumstances to support the suspicion that the defendant is that unusual employer who discriminates against the majority.”

On February 26 2025, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in the case. It seems likely the Court will remove the "background circumstances" test and require plaintiffs from marginalized groups and dominant groups to meet the same standard of proof.

Court

U.S. Supreme Court

Status

Filed March 18, 2024 | Ongoing

Relevant Law

Topic

Workplace discrimination

Litigation History

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

arrow_circle_right

U.S. District Court, Southern District of Ohio

arrow_circle_right

Significance

This case is important to watch closely. Some circuits require plaintiffs in "reverse discrimination" cases to provide evidence that their employer is the unusual employer who discriminates against the majority. If, as is likely, the Supreme Court decides that such evidence is not required and that all plaintiffs (whether traditional or reverse) only need to meet the same standard of proof, it will make it easier for reverse discrimination plaintiffs to succeed in their lawsuits in some circuits.

Nonetheless, given that many circuits already have the same standard in both kids of lawsuits, the implications of this decision are limited.