CASE NAME

Ames v. State of Ohio Department of Youth Services

Overview

Plaintiff sued Defendant arguing that she was discriminated against based on her sexual orientation (heterosexual) when Defendant denied her a promotion to Bureau Chief and demoted her from the position of PREA Administrator.

Details

The court affirmed the district court’s decision granting summary judgment for the Department. The court found that Plaintiff lacked evidence of “background circumstances to support the suspicion that the defendant is that unusual employer who discriminates against the majority.”

Ames appealed to the Supreme Court on March 20, 2024, requesting that the Court answer the question whether a majority-group plaintiff must show “background circumstances to support the suspicion that the defendant is that unusual employer who discriminates against the majority.”

Court

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Status

Filed April 19, 2023 | Appealed

Relevant Law

Title VII

Significance

If the Supreme Court agrees to hear this case, it could eliminate the requirement to show “background circumstances” in such cases, making it easier for dominant-group plaintiffs to succeed in discrimination claims under Title VII.