The definitions in our glossary are primarily sourced from Nolo’s Plain-English Law Dictionary and Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute. We have made slight modifications where needed for brevity and to better tailor the definitions to the specific needs of users of this website. For more detailed explanations of the terms, users are encouraged to review the definitions on these websites or conduct their own independent research.
CASE NAME
American Alliance for Equal Rights v. Pritzker
Overview
Plaintiff challenges an Illinois statute that established the Minority Teachers of Illinois Scholarship, arguing that the scholarship violates the Equal Protection Clause by restricting eligibility to aspiring teachers from racially and ethnically marginalized groups.
Details
On December 20, 2024, Defendant, Pritzker, asked the court to dismiss the case, arguing that Plaintiff lacked standing because neither the organization nor its members had suffered concrete harm from the scholarship eligibility criteria. Pritzker specifically claimed that the complaint’s reference to one unnamed member of the organization was insufficient, as naming the member was necessary for Plaintiff and the court to determine if they were genuinely ready and able to apply for the scholarship without the eligibility criteria.
In response to the motion to dismiss, Plaintiff argued that disclosing the unnamed member's identity was unnecessary to establish they had experienced or were likely to experience concrete harm required for standing. Plaintiff asserted they had provided sufficient facts to show the unnamed member would be ready and able to apply for the scholarship if not for the requirement that applicants belong to a racially or ethnically marginalized group.
Court
U.S. District Court, Central District of Illinois
Status
Filed October 22, 2024 | Ongoing
Relevant Law
Equal Protection Clause