The definitions in our glossary are primarily sourced from Nolo’s Plain-English Law Dictionary and Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute. We have made slight modifications where needed for brevity and to better tailor the definitions to the specific needs of users of this website. For more detailed explanations of the terms, users are encouraged to review the definitions on these websites or conduct their own independent research.
CASE NAME
Alliance for Fair Board Recruitment v. SEC
Overview
Petitioner brought a constitutional challenge (discrimination and free speech) to a rule requiring Nasdaq-listed companies to disclose information about board diversity statistics and either have—or explain why it lacks—at least one female director and at least one director who is a member of an underrepresented racial or ethnic minority or LGBTQ+.
Details
In an "en banc" decision (all judges from the circuit appearing), a majority of judges on the Court of Appeals held that Nasdaq's diversity disclosure requirement could not be squared with the Securities Exchange Act. The judges held that the SEC could not approve a disclosure rule unless it could "establish the rule has some connection to an actual, enumerated purpose of the Act." They observed that the primary purpose of the Act was "to protect investors and the American economy from speculative, manipulative, and fraudulent practices," and that Nasdaq's diversity disclosure requirement was disconnected from that purpose.
Court
Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
Status
Filed August 10, 2021 | Decided